I once bumped into an interesting letter dated April 9th, 1918 from the British Foreign Office addressed to Rudolf Holsti, a Finn who was somehow connected with the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. The date of the letter shows that Finland was still absorbed in a bloody civil war (January 27-May 15, 1918) after becoming independent on December 6, 1917.
The letter is revealing and not only shows the tense atmosphere in the country, but could possibly be the first official protest from a foreign government on the ill-treatment of non-Russian foreigners in independent Finland. World War I was still raging.
The letter reads:
Dear Doctor Holsti:-
With reference to our conversation yesterday you asked for particulars of the ill-treatment of certain British and American officers in Finland to which I referred.
As you are probably aware, a Mission consisting of Lieutenant Hitching a British officer and Lieutenant Tholing an American were recently sent to Wasa in order to negotiate a passage through Finland for the Allied Legations from Petrograd, who were detained there. They were accompanied by Lieutenant Granserre, the French Consul at Tornea. On arrival at Sunajoki (sic) they were received by Monsieur Procopi, the Chief of Police, who adopted a very aggressive attitude and demanded Lieutenant Hitching an explanation of his visit to Finland during such a crisis, reminding him that England was at war with Germany who was Finland’s best friend. Various absurd charges of speaking against Finland were made against the members of the Mission, but they were of course entirely without foundation and no attempt was made to substantiate them.
They then proceeded to General Mannerheim’s headquarters, where they were courteously received although they had no success in securing the object of their visit. Upon arrival at Wasa they went to the principal hotel where their appearance in the dining room cause considerable sensation. The people were openly hostile in their attitude and alleged the officers were Russian spies in English uniforms. A Finnish Jäger approached them and requested them to leave the premises, and on their refusal he retired with other officers to consult as to whether Lieutenants Hitching and Tholing should be expelled from the hotel by force. Shortly afterwards a second Jäger officer came up to them and gave them two minutes to leave the room, whereupon they withdrew amid shouts of abuse from the whole company, with the exception of some Swedish journalists who left at the same time and expressed their sympathy.
Lieutenant Hitching also reports that during their brief stay in the room the orchestra were especially requested to play the “Wacht am Rhein“. This was clearly intended as a studied insult to the Allied officers as it had already been played once before.
Perhaps the most serious feature of the incident was that Mr. Sario, the Minister of Foreign Affairs was present the whole time but did nothing whatever to protest and obviously regarded the whole matter as a good joke.
I think you will agree that this affair was an unfortuante one, and indicated a very unfriendly attitude on the part of FInnish authorities and the Finnish army, which renders it very difficult for us to give Finland all the assistance we should desire to give in her present difficulties. You may recollect that we were speaking recently of the possibility of appointing an informal British representative at Wasa, and you considered this a good proposal. I fear that after this incident the position of such a representative would be a quite untenable one, and it will be very difficult for us to proceed further with the idea at present.
Yours sincerely,
E.H. Carr (signed)
PS (handwritten) This incident is inferred to in a long an interesting article in today’s “Tmes.”

June 22, 2009 at 3:01 am
” in order to negotiate a passage through Finland for the Allied Legations from Petrograd”
So some englishman came to cause commotion and finns told them to fuck off, sounds fair to me.
They werent beaten up or forced by gunpoint, just told that they arent really welcome and why would they be?
You can tell me something about how much western countries helped us.. Only real help came from germany and partly political pressure from uk etc.
There were swedish, estonian etc volunteers and big collection made by usa finns to help for war effort but stil those werent even near what germany gave for us.
Only thing western countries gave to us was wrong sense of security and can you blaim that westerns werent looked up by people with common sense? We do know how nice its live next to massive russia and no thanks, we dont want anyone to fuck our relations with it.
June 22, 2009 at 12:57 pm
OIKEAA HISTORIAA
Kun aikanaan Venäjän imperiumia rakennettiin, huomasivat monet pienemmät kansat kuten mordvalaiset, bashkirit, marit, nenetsit, ukrainalaiset, armenialaiset, jakutialaiset jne. että eläminen venäläisten vallan alla on heille paras, turvallisin ja taloudellisesti tuottoisin vaihtoehto. Näin ollen kaikista näistä kansoista tuli lähetystö venäläisten tykö, ja lähetystöt pyysivät päästä venäläisten vallan alle. Aikansa mietittyään venäläiset suostuivat, vaikkakin pitkin hampain. Heillä ei ollut halua laajentua, mutta he olivat huolissaan pienten kansojen hyvinvoinnista, ja niinpä he suostuivat turvaamaan pienempien kansojen olemassaolon ja turvallisuuden omalla voimallaan.
Syyskuussa 1939 äärikansallismielinen Puolan hallitus oli vaikeuksissa Saksan kanssa. Koska sota saksalaisia vastaan ei oikein ottanut onnistuakseen, päättivät puolalaiset hyökätä viattoman Neuvostoliiton kimppuun. Rauhaa rakastava Neuvostoliitto oli pakotettu puolustautumaan, ja heidän sankarisotilaansa murskasivat hyökkäävien puolalaisten agression ja vapauttivat itäisen osan Puolasta. Hyökkäykseen osallistuneet puolalaiset upseerit tajusivat sotarikoksensa suuren syvyyden ja teloittivat tuhatmäärin itse itsensä Katynissa ampumalla itseään niskaan.
Marraskuun 30. päivä vuonna 1939 saivat neuvostoliittolaiset tarpeekseen suomalaisten valkobandiittien aggressioista. Suomalaisten jatkuva tykistötuli oli korsi, joka katkaisi kamelin selän. Mahtavan Suomen armeijan aiheuttama uhka Leningradille tuli näytettyä toteen tämän agression seurauksena. Rauhaa rakastavalla Neuvostoliitolla ei ollut muuta mahdollisuutta kuin hyökätä valkobandiitteja vastaan ja karkoittaa ne kauemmas Leningradista. Täytyy muistaa myös, että puna-armeija auttoi tämän rajaselkkauksen aikana suomalaista työväestöä pudottamalla pommikoneista elintarviketäydennyksiä suomalaisten kaupunkien työväenkortteleihin.
Vuosina 1939 – 1941 tapahtui Baltian maissa huomattavaa yhteiskunnallista kehitystä. Baltian maat liittyivät demokraattisissa vaaleissa Neuvostoliittoon ja puna-armeija siirsi Baltian maitten kansalaisten omasta pyynnöstä pois Baltiasta kymmeniä tuhansia pelottavia kansanvihollisia. Mm. pelottavan Pen-klubin jäsenet siirrettiin pois kuleksimasta. Valitettavasti puna-armeija joutui – Baltian maitten pyynnöstä – teloittamaan joitain tuhansia kansanvihollisia. Mutta tämä tapahtui täydessä yhteisymmärryksessä. Kulman kovin jätkä ojensi veljenkätensä heikommille.
Vuonna 1956 äärikansallismielinen Unkarin hallitus valmisteli hyökkäyssotaa Neuvostoliittoa vastaan. Maa oli jo mobilisoitu, mutta sankarillinen puna-armeija onnistui ennaltaehkäisevässä vastaiskussaan turvata neuvostokansalaisten turvallisuuden. Voi vain kuvitella minkälaisia hirmutöitä hampaisiin asti aseistettu Unkarin armeija olisi ehtinyt neuvostokansalaisille tehdä.
Vuonna 1968 sai Neuvostoliitto vihiä siitä, että Tsekkoslovakia pyrkii hajoittamaan koko Varsovan liiton ja alistamaan Itä-Euroopan läntisen hirmuvallan alle. Puna-armeija ja ehdottoman vapaaehtoisena puna-armeijaa avustaneet veljeskansat puolustivat rauhaa, turvallisuutta ja ihmisoikeuksia ja estivät tsekkoslovakialaisten aggression miehittämällä maan ja rauhoittamalla olot.
Vuonna 1979 oli Afganistanin ilmavoimien pommikoneet jo tankattu ja lastattu täyteen hirvittäviä rypälejalkaväkimiinoja. Afgaanijoukkojen tarkoitus oli koko Euroopan puoleisen Neuvostoliiton muuttaminen elinkelvottomaksi. Neuvostoliiton joukot ehtivät viime hetkellä estämään operaation. Afganistanissa asuvien kansojen hartaasta pyynnöstä neuvostojoukot toimivat rauhanturvaajina, koko kansan vankkumattomalla tuella seuraavat kymmenen vuotta ja lopulta vetäytyivät kukkasateen saattelemina.
Vaikka tsetseenit asuvat yhtenäisellä alueella, jossa on yksi kansa ja yksi kieli, ei heillä tietenkään ole oikeutta erota Venäjästä, aivan samoin kuin suomalaisilla valkobandiiteilla ei ollut oikeutta olemassaoloonsa vuonna 1939. Tsetseenin ampuma laukaus on terrorismia, venäläisen sotilaan ampuma rauhanluoti on rauhanturvaamista.
Tuoreessa konfliktissa Georgiassa on ihan selvä, että venäläiset ajattelevat vain ja ainoastaan osseettien hyvinvointia.
No näinhän tää täytyy olla. Kaikki nuo jutut on totta. Kun Venäjän presidentti sillai sanoi. Eikä Tarja eikä Matti ole sanoneet, että nyt puhuu Venäjän mies muunnettua totuutta. Eli venäläiset ovat aina vaan turvanneet rauhaa.
Hotelli Yrjöperskeles esittää kainon ehdotuksen. Ehkä jopa vallankumouksellisen. Oliskos mahdollista, että puolustusmäärärahoja voitais lisätä? Ja ne miinat pidettäis varastossa?
June 23, 2009 at 12:47 pm
–So some englishman came to cause commotion and finns told them to fuck off, sounds fair to me.
They werent beaten up or forced by gunpoint, just told that they arent really welcome and why would they be?
As you know Finland was not fighting on any side during WW1, except technically on with the Russians before independence. This type of attitude is what causes hatred to grow. That is not the way we treat guests — or do we?
June 23, 2009 at 5:56 pm
“That is not the way we treat guests — or do we?”
Yes we do, “vieraan on lienee aika lähteä” is common when quest starts up problems.
“This type of attitude is what causes hatred to grow.”
So if guests start problems and finns told them that they are free to leave starts hatred? isnt it misbehaving quests who start problem causing hatred?
“ohh nice to have you mr englishman, you cause that russia sees us as threat but since youre englishman no matter, russia probably only invade finland, forcible move us to somewhere and kill some. Thats all ok because youre english.”
“As you know Finland was not fighting on any side during WW1, except technically on with the Russians before independence.”
And thats relevant how? Does our “belowed eastern friend” wanish and somehow stop being real threat to us if we arent fighting a war? Does that we werent part of war somehow change a fact that foreigners were causing trouble?
June 24, 2009 at 5:18 am
-”As you know Finland was not fighting on any side during WW1, except technically on with the Russians before independence. This type of attitude is what causes hatred to grow. That is not the way we treat guests — or do we?”
And yet allied nations had audacity to come negotiate on treaties which would insult this neutrality.
How would they have reacted if it was German representation which requested free access? Hmm?
Before you start yapping about WW2, let me remind you that Finland was strongly neutral until invaded by USSR. Which threw the possibility of further absolute neutrality to the trashcan.
June 26, 2009 at 5:14 am
“That is not the way we treat guests — or do we?”
You are guest and i think it would be time for you to leave already.
July 2, 2009 at 12:47 pm
The incident that you report is interesting, Ricky, and if it can be generalised to illustrate the attitude of public officials towards western diplomatic approaches in spring 1918, then this may go some way to explain why the West was only willing to pay lip service to Finland’s needs just over two decades later.
I think the lessons of that period were learned well, however, and I could not imagine something of this kind happening nowadays. If anything, our officials are now too polite and accommodating, even when the architects of global mayhem come calling.
July 2, 2009 at 4:10 pm
Actually, the Missions in Petrograd were stuck in the midst of the civil war “on the wrong side” as the Allies were supporting the Russian Czar and the “White Armies”. Whatever the welcome was, the US mission came through the frontlines in 1918,
http://www.sodatkuvina.cjb.net/images/Sisallissota/Rintama/cwdata/AmerikkalaisetAhlaisissaPyrkiv%E4tValkoistenPuolelle.html
“Embassy of USA from St. Petersburg, Russia, trying to leave Russia. In photo
a member of embassy attempting to cross frontline to White side.”
July 3, 2009 at 7:52 pm
–That is not the way we treat guests — or do we?” You are guest and i think it would be time for you to leave already.
Juuso, I don’t think the problem lies with your hatred towards some ethnic groups. I am certain you have the same feelings about Finns who think differently than you. And, by the way, I will leave whenever I feel like it. That is my decision.
July 3, 2009 at 8:07 pm
Dear JusticeDemon, it is great to hear from you! That document from the Foreign Office is quite revealing. An interesting doctoral dissertation would be to write on the “ethnic” climate in Finland at the time; that is, that the Russians were not the only targets of the mayhem that ensued the Civil War of 1918. What about if you were a black USAmerican at that hotel in Seinjäjoki?
July 4, 2009 at 9:42 am
Concerning treatment of guests:
Alf on hospitality
July 14, 2009 at 8:42 am
“What about if you were a black USAmerican at that hotel in Seinjäjoki?”
In 1918? The Brits would have demanded he slept in the stable